sábado, 31 de octubre de 2015
Frankenstein
Frankenstein as an horror story
Horror story as a narrative genre had been highly popular since it was invented in the 18th century. Year after year, movies, series and books of horror story are consumed by people of all ages. The classic “Frankenstein” from Mary Shelley is not an exception. Her book influenced popular culture and inspired numerous films, television programs, video games and derive works. It is impossible to ignore the fascination that this genre and Frankenstein in particular cause in their fans.
The horror story genre was invented by Horace Walpole. His book “Castle of Otranto” (1765) founded the horror story as a legitimate literary form. The supernatural happenings and mysterious ambiance of this Gothic novel was widely emulated in the genre. In a horror story the focus is on creating a feeling of fear. It can include supernatural elements such as ghost, witches or vampires or it can address more realistic psychological fears. A good horror story has to include five elements. The first one and most important is fear, making sure that you can scare people. The second is surprise: something that people are not expecting to. Then an scenario consisting of someone waiting for something to happen and when it does it is completely unexpected, that is the suspense. Fourthly, the mystery with something unexplained; finally an spoiler, an anticipation of what is going to happen.
The famous novel “Frankenstein” (1818) introduced pseudoscience into the horror genre. Victor Frankenstein created an eight feet tall creature out of old body parts and strange chemicals, animated by a mysterious spark. The way in which Frankenstein was designed comes from the Fordism where workers put together each part to ensemble the whole. Victor became fascinated with the secret of life, discovered it and with his knowledge about modern science he brought a monster to life. Victor practised pseudoscience or a creation incorrectly presented as scientific but it did not adhere to a valid scientific method, could not be reliably tested or otherwise lacked scientific status.
Shelley used elements from nature to make the story scary, like a storm or dark forest that made the readers unsure and uneasy about what was going to happen. What is important to highlight is the fact that the scary natural world that Mary Shelley used in the book clearly contrasts with the mechanized world of the industrial revolution which took place at the time of the novel. She used foreshadowing to give suspense, for instance when we have evidence of murders that later was proved to be the monster.
Comparing modern horror story with “Frankenstein”, the story is not really what we think of as scary today because it lacks of bloody scenes as the modern ones or gore elements like a beheaded person. However, “Frankenstein ” has scary ideas considering that creating life secretly with irresponsible science is creepy and, what is more, the creature is created with parts of dead bodies what is highly spooky together with the fact that he was not a real person since he was fabricated from the use of machines. On the other hand, in modern horror story, killing an innocent is an important feature to be considered really horrific and in this novel various good people are killed by the monster, event that disappointed Victor and he wanted to destroy his creation. Similarly with some inventors of machines used to begin the industrial revolution intended to be beneficial but instead it made life more difficult resulting in unemployment. Another common characteristic of horror stories is that they have plot twist and “Frankenstein” does has a plot twist, for example when the monster wanted to take revenge against Victor, the reader focused on murder of Victor in his wedding night; nevertheless, the creature killed his wife instead.
Doubtly there is something really powerful in horror story that brings people to watch such a level of gore, blood and violence. The fear people feel while watching someone being chased by an axe-wielding is not different from the fear they feel if they were actually being chased by an axe-wielding murdered from the point of view of the brain. That is, when people watch horrific images, their heartbeat increases as much as 15 beats per minute, their palms sweat, their skin temperature drops several degrees, their muscles tense and their blood pressure spikes. Glenn Sparks, a professor of communication at Purdue University, studies the effects of horror films on viewers`physiology. “We can tell ourselves the images on the screen are not real but emotionally our brain reacts as if they are”. The more fear they felt, the more they claimed to enjoy the movie. Sparks believes scary movies may be one of the last vestiges of the tribal rite of passage. Sparks says: “There’s a motivation males have in our culture to master threatening situations. It goes back to the initiation rites of our tribal ancestors, where the entrance to manhood was associated with hardship. We’ve lost that in modern society and we may have found ways to replace it in our entertainment preferences”. Other examples of modern tribal rites include roller coasters and event frat-house hazing. Besides, there are other theories to explain the fascination of scary movies. One suggests that people may seek out violent entertainment as a way of coping with actual fears or violence. A popular explanation is expressed by the horror novelist Stephen King, who believed that scary movies act as a sort of safety value for our cruel or aggressive impulse. The implications of these ideas, called “symbolic catharsis”, is that watching violence forestalls the need to act it out.
To sum up, we cannot negate how much “Frankenstein” influenced the literature, specially the horror genre. Regarding that the novel as a scary story nowadays, it is not so scary for our modern standard but it was over that time it was written. About Victor Frankenstein , his sacrifice in order to create his monster seems like an act of inhumanity more than an act of love. His reasoning is overwhelmed by his fear, causing him to choose science over the safety of his friends and family. Finally, in the novel Mary Shelley aimed to demonstrate how man’s search for hidden knowledge could eventually lead to downfall and chaos. She wrote “Frankenstein” as a warning against the expansion of modern man with his machines in the industrial revolution.
French Revolution
The French Revolution:
The Europe of the XVIII century was living an age of great changes with the industrial revolution in its first steps. While England made the most of those advances, France was having hard times not only economically but also politically and in the society. New ideas were emerging with the Enlightenment which proclaimed the equality of the people and that they have inalienable rights. Besides it was necessary the separation of the church and the State as well as a constitution that ruled the country. That is to say, the overthrow of the Ancient Regime was a strong need.
During the period 1787-1789 France was living on the edge of revolution. Several problems coincided at the same time whereupon France found herself hopelessly, lost and stuck. The first of the problems was that the French government was bankrupt due to the costly wars. This, together with the over spending of the king and the queen, left the country without any money for the people. The bad harvest was another important problem. The severe weather like heavy rains and hard winters as well as the too hot summers caused very poor harvest in France leaving the people starved. On the other hand,King Louis XVI called the States General in Versailles where the nobles and the clergy denied to pay taxes in spite of the bad situation of the country. As the peasants problems were not considered at the Estates General, they decided to gather in a National Assembly to draw up a constitution. The problem was that they would not leave the Royal tennis Court until King Louis agreed to meet their demands.
During that period France was divided principally into three states which had huge differences among them. The most numerous as well as unfavorable ones were the peasants who were forced to do military service, had to pay taxes and even lived in awful conditions with low incomes. As regards the nobility, they had huge privileges and almost complete authority over peasants. They were exempt from taxes and from doing military service, as well. Nobility had a luxurious way of living thanks to tax collection.Similarly, the clergy, the minority of the population, lived comfortably in great palaces and in chateaux. That is to say, not only the first state ( the clergy) but also the second one (the nobility), both lived at expense of the third state (the peasants).
It was evident that the situation got out of control and the King Louis had no clear idea how to deal with it. The annoying people captured the King and his family after the National Assembly on 5-6th October, 1789. Then he pretended the role of a constitutional monarch so he signed decrees from the Assembly. In an attempt for a solution, Marie-Antoinette wrote to the king of Prussia, Spain and Sweden as well as the emperors of Austria and Russia to suggest an alliance to bring to an end the revolution. Not finding a solution, Louis tried to escape to Montmedy but he and his family found some problems in the way. Louis was recognised on the route and a crowd prevented his coach from proceeding. On June 22th they were brought back to Paris and a National Assembly decided to keep Louis as a constitutional monarch. Finally, on 30th September, 1791, the Assembly declared his work done after having proclaiming a Constitution and Louis having sworn an oath of loyalty. The revolution was certainly end. However, one day after being convicted of conspiracy with foreign powers and sentenced to death by the French National Convention, King Louis XVI was executed by guillotine in the Place de la Revolution in Paris.
After King Louis being sent to the guillotine, France became a huge chaos. Thousand of people were killed for considered them traitors or anti-revolutionaries. Many peasants revolted against the radical Jacobin government and the period called “The Terror” began. Because of the inestability of France, several emergency measures were taken so a Committee of Public Safety was established by the Convention. This Committee allowed the revolution to be developed. To defend the revolution against enemies, suspects were convicted for any kind of evidence and, what is more, the penalty was death. It is unthinkable to estimate how many people were executed because more than 12.000 were officially guillotined and many more were shot, drowned or shot by a cannon fire. Those who faced tribunal were severely treated. Weary for so many murders, people blamed the leader of the Committee, Robespierre, for all the awful incidents during the Reign of terror. He was arrested and imprisoned being guillotined later on july 28th.
To conclude, the revolution ended with the absolutism tough a constitutional monarchism started to rule France similarly driven but under a constitution. Concerning to peasants, they revealed against the regime violently killing people which, in a way, was similar with what the higher states did with them, that is, starving the people. Finally, Robespierre encouraged the use of the guillotine which was what ironically ended with his life in 1794.
viernes, 25 de septiembre de 2015
Tale of two cities: essay
Individual essay: Resurrection
The Dickens`s novel “Tale of two cities” is situated in the revolutionary France and England of the XVIII century. It was a time of great changes as well as violence and death. Charles Dickens illustrates these events in a particular way. He personify the “resurrection” of France and England before the revolution with the “recalling to life” of certain characters of the book who give a twist in the story. What is more, he connects the theme of the resurrection with the death and sacrifice in an extraordinary way.
The idea of resurrection appears for the first time in an encrypted message that Jarvis Lorry, a businessman, gave to Jerry Cruncher. The Tellson`s Bank messenger stopped the Dover mail-coach in which Lorry was traveling and told him to wait at Dover for a young woman. Mr Lorry answered with the encrypted message “recalled to life”.
Another fact that represents a symbol of resurrection happened with certain dark business of Jerry Cruncher. In chapter three Dickens tells us that Jerry “... was on his way to dig someone out of grave” in the shadows of the night. He dug up dead bodies and sold them to scientists in order to increase his income.
The transformation of Doctor Manette exemplifies another example of “resurrection”. He mutated from being a mindless shoemaker who was prisoned for eighteen years into a man of clearness. His surrounding and his loving daughter caring influenced Doctor Manette positively so as he could covered from his long-suffering confinement.
An unexpected twist of Sydney Carton represents a different expression of resurrection. Carton was an indifferent and alcoholic attorney with no prospects in life; however, he was in love with Lucie. At the end of the story, his deep feelings for Lucie made him sacrifices himself for Lucie´s happiness. Sydney changed places with the condemned to death Charles Darnay and then he met his decease at the guillotine giving, in some way, a meaning to his life.
Finally, the story shows us how peacefully impoverished peasants revealed after suffering several years of atrocities from the higher states. Besides the fact that peasants had to pay several taxes, the bourgeoisie took advantage of the surplus of labor by keeping wages low. The poor people remained poor and often they lived cramped in squalor so, in their attempt to fight their way out of such poverty and despair, they attacked the Bastille and the French Revolution began. All of this illustrates a clear case of resurrection of the disadvantaged lower states against the aristocrats.
To sum up, Resurrection was such an important theme for Dickens that he developed it along all the book and through several character. Nevertheless, the most important resurrection took place with the fall of the ancient regime of France with the resulting renewed France after the appearance of the Guillotine.
jueves, 10 de septiembre de 2015
George III: Britain under rule of a mentally diseased King
Britain
under rule of a mentally diseased King
It is
astonishing the way in which a person can be blind to achieve power. Ambition
is the most common characteristic and the perfect word to describe this kind of
people. It seems as if anything is possible in order to reach privileges or
influences and there is always an opportunity instead of impossibility. People
usually take so many risks in the search for power. There is no brotherhood nor
friendship nor even family matters in the conquest of fame at any price. What
is more, envy often comes as a usual consequence of ambitious people. We can
find lots of examples of people thirsty of power not only in the real life and
throughout the history but also in fiction.
The king
George III ruled Great Britain and Ireland from October 1760 to January 1801.
At the end of that period George got sick, although he continued reigning. His
erratic behaviour confused his family as well as the Members of Parliament. He suffered from Porphyria.
The symptoms of the disease included aches and pains, as well as blue urine and
mental disturbances. George became progressively depressed, insane and blind.
He suffered in isolation and that period was like a torture for him: he was
kept in straight jacket and behind bars to be medically supervised and
protected. At that time he was not diagnosed as having Porphyria because
doctors could not think and prove a logical explanation for the King´s
condition. The disease had lapses of improvements but in periods of crises the
reign stayed without any ruler. Once George regained consciousness and became
less eccentric, he was back to have the
entire leadership of his country again. This impulse made him become even more
popular and loved than never before. However, after a final relapse in 1810, a
regency was established and George III's eldest son, Prince of Wales, ruled as
Prince Regent.
On the other hand, George´s son, the Prince of Wales,
had a terrible relationship with his father. The only thing he was worried
about was the possibility of being in the throne. George III´s disease was not
a major problem for the Prince. He seeked to displace his father at all cost.
His courageous and dangerous plan was to conspire to have his father declared
mad so he could become the ruler of the kingdom. Consequently, he was against
his mother´s thoughts, Queen Charlotte, who wanted his husband to recover from
the illness and come back to rule. The Prince of Wales tried to persuade
everybody several times in order to have a flawless victory in Parliament.
Unfortunately for him, that was not possible because of the popularity of his
father coupled with the fact that he was not chosen by votes until this
mentioned final relapse of his father. In addition, George was always returning
to his throne mainly with his wife´s support.
All in all, and based on the previous research of events during George
III’s reign, it is evident that ruling in his conditions was not a positive
point for Britain. At the same time, George did not count on somebody to rely
on his responsibilities as a ruler. Consequently, during all his worst days
there were only henchmen without limits trying to discharge him from the
throne. If it were necessary, they were ready to kill him in order to get his
whole power and wealth. Nevertheless, his perseverance made people loved him much than before and as he
returned after recovering partially from his disease he achieved in getting
more followers.
We conclude with the following well-known advice taken from one of the
“Spiderman” ´s movies: “A great power carries a big responsibility”.To rule a
country or an entire empire is a responsibility that affects not only the
country or empire itself but also the people living in it. A ruler must be
completely conscious of the importance of every choice.
jueves, 2 de julio de 2015
miércoles, 1 de julio de 2015
Chronology of conflict between GB and Fr
Military aspect
French and British Conflict Chronology:
The chronology of war between France and England.
1106
Sep 28
King Henry of England defeats his brother Robert at the Battle of Tinchebrai and reunites England and Normandy.
1169
Jan 06
Peace is established between Henry II of England and Louis VII of France.
1198
Sep 20
Richard I beats the French at Gisors
1214
Jul 27
At the Battle of Bouvines in France, Philip Augustus of France defeats John of England.
1216
May 21
Prince Louis of France lands in England to claim the English Throne.
1259
Dec 04
Treaty of Paris: English king Henry III & French king Louis IX.
1303
May 20
Treaty of Paris restores Gascony to British in Hundred Years War.
1340
Jun 24
The English fleet defeats the French fleet at Sluys, off the Flemish coast. (First major engagement of 100 years war.)
1346
Jul 12
King Edward III lands an invasion force of about 10,000 men on the coast of Normandy.
Aug 23
Victory of English under King Edward III over French (Philip VI) in Battle of Crécy (100 Yrs War).
Aug 25
(or 26th) Edward III of England defeats Philip VI's army at the Battle of Crecy in France.
Aug 26
English longbows defeat French in Battle of Crecy.
Sep 04
England's Edward III begins the siege of Calais that would last for almost a year.
1347
Aug 03
Six burghers of the surrounded French city of Calais surrender to Edward III of England in hopes of relieving the siege.
Aug 03
Calais, France surrenders to Edward III of England in the Hundred Years War.
1356
Sep 19
In a landmark battle of the Hundred Years' War, English Prince Edward defeats the French at Poitiers.
1360
May 08
Treaty of Brétigny signed by English & French
1364
Sep 29
Battle of Auray, English forces defeat French at Brittany.
1415
Oct 25
An English army under Henry V defeats the French at Agincourt, France. The French had out numbered Henry's troops 60,000 to 12,000 but British longbows turned the tide of the battle.
1419
Jan 19
French city of Rouen surrenders to Henry V in Hundred Years War.
1420
May 21
Treaty of Troyes-French King Charles VI gives France to English in an unsuccessful attempt to end the Hundred Years War.
1429
Feb 12
Battle of the Herrings salt fish convoy for English army at siege of Orleans repulses French.
1450
Apr 15
French defeat English at Battle of Formigny in 100 Years' War.
1453
Jul 17
France defeats England at Castillon, France, ending the Hundred Years' War.
1475
Aug 29
Edward IV agrees to withdraw army from France in exchange for gold under Truce of Picquigny.
1513
Aug 16
Henry VIII of England and Emperor Maximilian defeat the French at Guinegatte, France, in the Battle of the Spurs.
1527
Apr 30
Henry VIII of England and King Francis of France sign treaty of Westminster.
1528
Jan 22
England & France declare war on Emperor Charles V.
1544
Sep 14
Henry VIII's forces take Boulogne, France.
1546
Jun 07
The Peace of Ardes ends the war between France and England.
1549
Aug 09
England declares war on France.
1550
Mar 24
France & England sign Peace of Boulogne.
1557
Aug 10
French troops are defeated by Emmanuel Philibert's Spanish army at St. Quentin, France.
1558
Jan 07
The French, under Francois, the Duke of Guise, finally take the port of Calais, the last English possession in France, from the English.
Jun 22
The French take the French town of Thioville from the English.
1561
Sep 20
Queen Elizabeth of England signs a treaty at Hamptan Court with French Huguenot leader Louis de Bourbon, the Prince of Conde. The English will occupy Le Harve in return for aiding Bourbon against the Catholics of France.
1564
Apr 11
England & France sign Peace of Troyes.
1572
Apr 21
France & England sign anti-Spanish military covenant.
1589
Sep 21
The Duke of Mayenne of France is defeated by Henry IV at the Battle of Arques.
1629
Apr 14
England & France sign Peace of Susa.
1662
Oct 17
Charles II sells Dunkirk to the French (Treaty of Dunkirk).
1666
Jan 26
France declares war on England & Münster.
1670
May 26
Charles II and Louis XIV sign a secret treaty in Dover, England, ending hostilities between England and France.
Dec 31
France & England sign Boyne-treaty.
1689
May 11
Battle of Bantry Bay, French & English naval battle.
1692
Aug 03
French forces under Marshal Luxembourg defeat the English at the Battle of Steenkerke in the Netherlands.
1697
Sep 03
King William's War ends; French and English forces neither win nor lose.
1701
Sep 07
England, Austria, and the Netherlands form an Alliance against France.
1702
May 14
England & Netherlands declares war on France & Spain.
Oct 12
Admiral Sir George Rooke defeats the French fleet off Vigo.
1704
Aug 13
The Duke of Marlborough and Prince Eugene of Austria defeat the French Army at the Battle of Blenheim in the War of Spanish Succession. (XDG, p 4A, 8/13/2000)
1708
Jul 11
The French are defeated at Oudenarde, Malplaquet, in the Netherlands by the Duke of Marlborough and Eugene of Savoy.
1709
Sep 11
John Churchill, Duke of Marlborough, wins the bloodiest battle of the 18th century at great cost, against the French at Malplaquet.
1711
Aug 23
A British attempt to invade Canada by sea fails.
1713
Apr 11
The Treaty of Utrecht is signed, ending QUEEN ANNE'S War (War of Spanish Succession in Europe). France cedes Maritime provinces to Britain; Gibralter becomes British. The treaty of which recognizes Iroquois as British subjects.
1743
Jun 27
English defeat French at Dettingen. Battle of Dettingen in Bavaria, the last engagement in which a British monarch (King George II) participated in person.
1744
Mar 15
French King Louis XV declares war on England in what would be called King George’s War (1744 - 1748), third of four North American wars waged by the British and French. The Iroquois give the British permission to build a blockhouse at the Forks of the Ohio.
1745
May 11
Victory of French over British at Battle of Fontenoy.
1755
Jul 08
Britain breaks off diplomatic relations with France as their disputes in the New World intensify.
Sep 08
British forces under William Johnson defeat the French and the Indians at the Battle of Lake George.
1756
May 17
Britain declares war on France (7 Years' or French & Indian War).
Aug 14
French commander Louis Montcalm takes Fort Oswego, New England, from the British.
Aug 31
The British at Fort William Henry, New York, surrender to Louis Montcalm of France.
1758
Mar 27
Battle at Emmerich: British army floats around France the Rhine.
Jun 23
British and Hanoverian armies defeat the French at Krefeld in Germany.
Jul 08
The British attack on Fort Carillon at Ticonderoga, New York, is foiled by the French.
1759
Apr 08
British troops chase French out of Masulipatam India.
Apr 23
British forces seize Basse-Terre and Guadeloupe from France.
Aug 01
British and Hanoverian armies defeat the French at the Battle of Minden, Germany.
Aug 18
The French fleet is destroyed by the British under "Old Dreadnought" Boscawen at the battle of Lagos Bay.
Sep 18
Quebec surrenders to the British after a battle which sees the deaths of both James Wolfe and Louis Montcalm, the British and French commanders.
Nov 20
British navy defeats French at Battle of Quiberon Bay.
1760
Jan 22
Battle at Wandewash India British troops beat French.
Sep 08
The French surrender the city of Montreal to the British.
1762
Feb 05
Martinique, a major French base in the Lesser Antilles of the West Indies, surrenders to the British.
1778
Feb 06
England declares war on France.
Jul 27
British and French fleets fight to a standoff in the first Battle of Ushant.
1781
Apr 29
French fleet stops Britain from seizing the Cape of Good Hope.
1782
Apr 12
Battle at Les Saintes West-Indies British fleet beats French.
1783
Jan 20
Britain signs a peace agreement with France and Spain, who allied against it in the American War of Independence.
1786
Sep 26
France and Britain sign a trade agreement in London.
1793
Dec 19
French troops recapture Toulon from the British.
1794
Jun 01
British victory over French in naval battle off Ushant ‘Glorious first of June.'
Aug 21
France surrenders the island of Corsica to the British.
1798
Aug 01
Admiral Horatio Nelson routs the French fleet in the Battle of the Nile at Aboukir Bay, Egypt.
Aug 02
British under Adm Horatio Nelson beat French at Battle of Nile.
1800
Sep 05
Britain captures Malta; French troops surrender to British forces.
miércoles, 24 de junio de 2015
viernes, 22 de mayo de 2015
Glorious Revolution essay: compare and contrast the two views
The Glorious Revolution marked greatest changes in the history of Europe. The causes of the revolution of 1688 were not only religious but also political. That is the reason why there are many points of view which depicted the event diversely.
One of the most relevant points of view is the one of the BBC. This UK´s public-service broadcaster described the Glorious Revolution as the one which established the supremacy of the Parliament over the British monarchy. On the other hand, The House of the Commons Information Office characterized the revolution as the Parliament assertion of its own rights over the monarchy. That is to say that, for the House of Commons` point of view, the Parliament recovered the rights over the Crown.
One similarity between the BBC and The House of Commons is that both of them described the event as a peaceful or bloodless revolution. The people killed during the Glorious Revolution was very little in comparison with other revolutions.The BBC highlighted that the James II`s reign was replaced by the joint of his protestant daughter Mary and her Dutch husband, William of Orange. However, The House of Commons described the culmination of the revolution with the exile of James II and the accession to the throne of William and Mary.
The BBC version writes a complete paragraph telling about the fear of popery in James´reign and the origin of this fear. However. the House of Commons scarcely names the matter relating about the succession of James II that occurred without incident in spite of fear of Catholicism.
The House of Commons gives more specific information like naming different events and describing them in detail such as the succession of James in 1685, the repeal of Tests Acts in 1686, the Declaration of Indulgence in 1687, the Glorious Revolution itself in 1688 and the Bill of Rights in 1689. On the other hand, the BBC just gives general information about the Glorious Revolution.
The House of Commons also speaks about ‘Historical Interpretations’ which consists on ‘The Whig view’, ‘The Marxist interpretation’ and some historians’ view in order to support their point of view about the meaning of the Glorious Revolution for them as “a vindication of our ancient rights”. On the contrary, the BBC just enumerates some of the consequences of the revolution without giving no many details about them insinuating a neutral point of view about the revolution.
The House of Commons describes the Bill or Rights as a condemnation of the James´actions and an assertion of what is described as “certain ancient rights and liberties”, whereas BBC describes it as a real restriction on the crown.
Both of them have similarities and differences but what is interesting to remark is the approaching of each article in which the House of Commons is concerned about judging the actions of James II and approving the consequences of the revolution while the BBC describes and enumerates the most relevants events of the Glorious Revolution.
jueves, 7 de mayo de 2015
viernes, 24 de abril de 2015
miércoles, 1 de abril de 2015
Suscribirse a:
Entradas (Atom)